Evaluating Evidence for Practice

EvaluatingEvidence for Practice

EvaluatingEvidence for Practice

Inthe nursing profession, each medical claim requires valid informationto support the assertion. The objective of this essay is outliningcorrect strategies for deciphering statistical conclusions,interpreting data tables and analyzing data. In addition, the essaywill examine some typical nursing statistical tests and thedifference between clinical and statistical significance.

Whatare some of the criteria or essential elements, which you, as thecommittee leader should consider when reviewing the submissions fordeveloping clinical practice changes?

Themain features that committee leaders should consider when determiningvalidity of treatment review submissions for designing clinicalpractice changes includes the research methodology. Many validclinical practice changes feature mixed research approach, whichcombines qualitative and quantitative research techniques(Ingham-Broomfield, 2008, p. 105).

Second,the committee leader should consider the author’s brief biographyof the author. Studies conducted by highly experienced professionalswith practical skills in the field for many years is more crediblethan information published by inexperienced authors(Ingham-Broomfield, 2008, p. 104).

Third,the author should use reliable literature research that is supportedby previous knowledge bodies. Literature research helps to critiqueand place research information in previous studies(Ingham-Broomfield, 2008, p. 104).

Lastly,research methodology applied in the study may also enhance ordecrease its credibility. For example, empirical evidence,experimental and quasi-experimental offers credible and reliable data(Ingham-Broomfield, 2008, p. 105)

Whatimplementation tools may assist you, as the committee leader, indetermining if a study, even one with adequate evidence, provides fora practical transition from research to practice?

Oneof the tools that can assist committee leaders in determining thevalidity of published studies with sufficient evidence is peerreviews. If other professionals approve the data or findings of agiven experiment, this implies that the data is valid. Second, thedata collection method should contain empirical evidence thatresearchers can conduct in a new research and achieve similarfindings. The third tool involves evaluating the biography ofinvestigators. For instance, the place of employment, certificationposition, and academic degrees are all valid tools for determiningcredibility of the author’s research method (Ingham-Broomfield,2008, p. 106).

Describesome common errors or pitfalls, that must be avoided whentransitioning evidence to practice and some reliable methods foravoidance?

Whentransitioning evidence, researchers must ensure that study subjectsattend all the observation tests. Besides, experts should place testsamples in safe places where they would be free from any form ofcontamination. Lastly, a control experiment is required as it offersa comparison platform for determining credibility of giveninformation. Besides, the data should have high consistency(Ingham-Broomfield, 2008, p. 107).

References

Ingham-Broomfield,R.B., (2008). A nurses’ guide to the critical reading of research.Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26 (1), 102-109.