This part offers an introduction to the California Constitution and Chinese Exclusion Act. For instance, it is indicated that, California`s constitution is one of the longest accumulations of laws on the planet, since it is 110 pages with it. The constitution can be changed by activities approved by voters.
In this section, the history of the calfornia constitution is offered. This includes the number of changes it has witnssed among others.
Signatories of the first 1849 Constitution 4
This section indicates the, signatories to the state`s unique 1849 constitution.
Contrasts from Different Constitutions 4
The section indicates the contrasts which this constitution have as compared to he others including is length, content such as the Article 4, area 8(d) which characterizes a "direness statute" as one "essential for prompt protection of people in general peace, wellbeing, or security" among others.
Alterations and Amendments 6
The number of alterations and amendments made to the constitution is clearly indicated. For instance, an alteration may be put on the vote by either executing a two-thirds vote in the State Legislature of California or marks equivalent to 8% of the entire voters given at the lastig gubernatorial decision, among the most reduced edges for comparative measures of any U.S. state.
Chinese Exclusion Act 6
This section explains what the Chinese Exclusion Act entails. For example, Chinese exclusion act as not the most discriminatory policies in the United States, in reality it as the policy that refused all Chinese from participating in any form of work in California that hurt the Chinese community the most
Backlash against the Chinese Population 9
This section indiates the cause of worry which involved the increase in chinese population in the USA leading to exclusion. This is an imporatnt part of the californai constitution.
The Case of the Exclusion Act 11
This section indiates the real exclusion due to increase in chinese population in the USA. This is an imporatnt part of the californai constitution.
In this section, major points covered within the paper will be concluded.
CaliforniaConstitution and Chinese Exclusion Act
TheConstitution found in the State of California refers to the reportthat creates and shows the duties, powers, structure and capacity ofthe administration of the U.S. condition of California. The firstconstitution, which was taken in November 1849 ahead of time ofCalifornia achieving U.S. statehood in 1850, keeps up localealongside the current constitution, which was endorsed on May 7, 1879(Law.georgetown.edu). In Section 2 of section 3, the now Constitutionthere is reference to the first limits as expressed in the 1849Constitution at Article 7 (Moorhead 291).
Theconsequence of Progressive doubt of chose authorities, the 1879constitution is the third longest on the planet (behind theconstitutions of India and of Alabama), and has been depicted as "theideal case of what a constitution should not to be"(Law.georgetown.edu).
California`sconstitution is one of the longest accumulations of laws on theplanet, since it is 110 pages with it. A piece of this length isbrought about by the way that very many voter activities take themanifestation of an established correction (Bryce). The constitutioncan be changed by activities approved by voters. Activities can beproposed by the Legislature, Governor, or by prominent request,giving California a standout amongst the most adaptable lawfulframeworks on the planet (Grodin and Calvin 13).
Avery big portion of the individual rights provisions in the stateconstitution have been understood as ensuring rights much moreextensive than the Bill of Rights in the government constitution. Anamazing case is the situation of Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins,in which "free discourse" rights past those tended to bythe establishment of the First Amendment on the United States FederalConstitution was identified from the Constitution of California bycourts there (Grodin and Calvin 93).
Theconstitution has seen various changes following its funny drafting.It was changed without any preparation a few times preceding thedrafting of the current 1879 constitution, which has itself beenaltered or modified.
Becauseof across the board open loathing with the compelling railroads whichcontrolled California`s legislative issues and economy toward thebegin of the twentieth century, Progressive Era legislatorsspearheaded the idea of forcefully altering the state constitution byactivity keeping in mind the end goal to cure saw indecencies. From1911, the tallness of the U.S. Dynamic Era, to 1986, the CaliforniaConstitution was changed or reconsidered in excess of 500 times. Theconstitution continuously got to be progressively bloated, promptingfruitless endeavors towards a third established tradition in 1897,1914, 1919, 1930, 1934 and 1947. By 1962 the constitution haddeveloped to 75,000 words, which around then was longer than someother state constitution however Louisiana`s.
Thatyear, the electorate affirmed the formation of a CaliforniaConstitution Revision Commission, which took a shot at an extensiveamendment of the constitution from 1964 to 1976. The electorateapproved the Commission`s corrections in 1966, 1970, 1972, and 1974,however dismisses the 1968 correction, whose essential substantiveimpact would have been to make the state`s administrator of schoolsinto a named as opposed to a chose official (Grodin and Calvin 44).The Commission at last expelled around 40,000 words from theconstitution. Repair California looked to qualify two activities onthe 2010 statewide poll which would have called for an alternate,restricted, established tradition, however this exertion fizzledbecause of an absence of funding (Law.georgetown.edu).
Signatoriesof the First 1849 Constitution
Aconsiderable lot of the signatories to the state`s unique 1849constitution were themselves unmistakable in their own privilege, andare consequently recorded underneath. The rundown of signatories iseminent for the consideration of a few Californios (earlyCalifornians of European, African and Native American blend)(Moorhead 284).
Asopposed to the comprehensive 1849 tradition, the 1879 sacredtradition was intensely overwhelmed by late settlers from Europe, andin addition vagrants from southern and focal states(Law.georgetown.edu). Accordingly, both the air of the tradition andthe tenor of the archive it delivered were much all the moreexplicitly bigot against persons not of Western or Northern Europeandrop (Korey 61). It would take about a century to cleanse theprejudice out of the state constitution.
Contrastsfrom Different Constitutions
TheConstitution of California is listed as the longest on the planet.The length has been ascribed to a mixture of components, for example,impact of past Mexican common law, absence of confidence in choseauthorities and the way that numerous activities take themanifestation of an established alteration. A few alterationsincluded the approval of the making of state government orgs,including the State Bar in California and State CompensationInsurance Fund (Moorhead 289) the reason for such corrections was toprotect the offices from being assaulted as an illegally widepractice of police force or characteristic legal force.
Notat all like other state constitutions, the California Constitutionfirmly secures the corporate presence of urban communities anddistricts and awards them wide entire home run powers. Byparticularly empowering urban communities to pay areas to performlegislative capacities for them, Section 8 of Article XI broughtabout the ascent of the agreement city (Korey 37).
Article4, area 8(d) characterizes a "direness statute" as one"essential for prompt protection of people in general peace,wellbeing, or security" any proposed bill including such aprocurement incorporates an "announcement of truths constitutingthe need" and a two-thirds lion`s share of each one house isobliged to likewise independently pass the bill`s desperation segment(Law.georgetown.edu).
Aconsiderable lot of the individual rights statements in the stateconstitution have been interpreted as ensuring rights more extensivethan the Bill of Rights in the government constitution. Twoincredible cases incorporate (1) the Pruneyard Shopping Center v.Robins case including an inferred right to free discourse in privateshopping plazas, and (2) the first choice in America in 1972 whichdiscovered capital punishment illegal, California v. Anderson, 6 Cal.3d 628. This prominent that under California`s state constitution astronger security applies than under the U.S. Constitution`s eighthAmendment(Moorhead 290) the previous forbids disciplines that are"unfeeling or bizarre", while the recent just deniesdisciplines that are "barbarous and uncommon" (Noel 54).The constitution likewise presents upon ladies equity of rights in"entering or seeking after a business, calling, occupation, orwork." This is the most punctual state established equivalentrights procurement on record.
Twocolleges are explicitly said in the constitution: the University ofCalifornia and Stanford University. UC is one of just nine state-runstate funded colleges in the United States whose autonomy frompolitical obstruction is explicitly ensured by the stateconstitution. Since 1900, Stanford has appreciated the profit of anestablished condition protecting Stanford-claimed property fromcharges the length of it is utilized for instructive purposes(Desty).
Theconstitution of California recognizes protected corrections andmodifications, the recent of which is thought to be a "significantchange to the whole constitution, instead of … a less far reachingchange in one or a greater amount of its procurements"(Law.georgetown.edu). Both oblige entry of a California ticketsuggestion by voters, however they vary by they way they may beproposed. An alteration may be put on the vote by either executing atwo-thirds vote in the State Legislature of California or marksequivalent to 8% of the entire voters given at the lastiggubernatorial decision, among the most reduced edges for comparativemeasures of any U.S. state (Noel 19).
Correctionsinitially obliged a protected tradition however today may be passedwith the approbation of both two-thirds of the assembly and a largerpart of voters while improved following its beginnings, the updatemethodology is viewed as all the more politically charged and hard toeffectively pass than a revision (Korey 78).
TheU.S is a state that is created on the idea of immigration andchances, and in its history there is no other place where thestatement mentioned above becomes very very true. The USa is acountry that is known all by all individuals of the world byeverybody as a country that maintains openness and that is willing toaccept the movement of people from other countries, especially fromcountries that have a lot of poverty to look for opportunity, what iscommonly known in America as the ‘’American dream’’ (Cahee1). But this American dream to a big level remains a fantasy to mostpeople who migrate to the United States from other nations in searchof opportunities. In the year 1882 the country had gotten tired ofthe movement of many Chinese in their country. To respond to thisevent, the country made federal legislation, commonly referred to asthe Chinese exclusion Act, that prevented people from China fromentering United States, and that ultimately stopped the population inthe United States from growing exponentially (Daniels, Roger, &Otis 98). This to many people is shocking, but what was even moreworrying was that these discriminatory and biased rules and policiesdid not begin with the Chinese Exclusion Act. The Chinese ExclusionAct marked the last step out of the many exclusion processes that hadbegun in at the state level. By the year 1880 there were very manyanti-Chinese ordinances that ere meant to prevent the movement ofChinese into America and these policies soon found their way at thenational level (David & Alice 59).
Itis good saying that, Chinese exclusion act as not the mostdiscriminatory policies in the United States, in reality it as thepolicy that refused all Chinese from participating in any form ofwork in California that hurt the Chinese community the most(Sandmeyer&Elmer 123).By the 1880 California was home for more than 75% of the all theChinese people who had migrated into United States of America. Thiswas one of the most biased legislation that finally forced many chinepeople to move from California and settle in other state s that didnot have biased laws against immigrants. The United States ofamerica, and more specifaically the state of California had done whatno other state had ever done or even shall ever do in relations toopen immigration and diversity (Cahee3). This point in time marks a very darker periods in the history of theU.S. As said in the above statement the Chinese Exclusion Act of theyear 1882 barred people moving from China into entering into theUnited States, but it was the constitutions of the state ofCalifornia of 1879 that at the end of the day and permanentlyaltered racial makeup and demographic of the United States. Theconstitution changes also greatly changed state rights andlegislations (Sandmeyer&Elmer 120).
TheCalifornia constitution is one the most well known example andincidence of local legislation that touched on issues that related toemployment of people based on their ethnicity and race outside of thesouth, and policies relating the black codes. There is no other stateconstitution in the United State at this point in time that hadspecifically targeted a certain race or group of people from a givencountry (Cahee6). . The local government in California passed and implemented thisform of discrimination based on race, and to think about the passageof the legislation it is clear to us that even many people of thewhite decent shared this idea of discrimination against the Chinesepeople.
TheCalifornia constitution to a large extent and in a permanent waychanged totally and completely the California and even at the largescene the United States racial makeup (David& Alice 57). . At this period in history there had never been any policy or statelegislation that altered the landscape of the demographic of thecountry more than the Chinese Exclusion Act. It totally changed theimmigration pattern into the state of California. It is true to saythat immigration affects every person in a country, but the ChineseExclusion Act of 879 in the state of California probably had the mosteffect in California (Cahee7). .
Thisbiased constitution changes in the state of California also raisesthe questions and displays the power and influence of stategovernments at this point in the political history of U.S, becausethese anti-Chinese ordinances soon found the ay up to the federalgovernment. The anti-Chinese legislations started with a lot ofvigor in the state of California and such ideas spiraled very fast tothe federal level within a period of ten years. Some of these issuesalso give the American people insight to policies in events of hardeconomic times. Many of these biased policies were formulated duringthe economic crisis of the 1870s which depicts the change in normsand moral of the American people as the economic environment becomesmore and more challenging (David7 Alice 57). This era in the American history also gives people from differentparts of the world insight into immigration practices some of whichare still applied today in certain countries. There are numerousexplanations why this issue of biased policies in California toardsto particular group of people if wrong both morally and politically(Sandmeyer&Elmer 124).
Backlashagainst the Chinese Population
Nonetheless,it is healthy to be aware of that we can not fully understand thesebiased and racially motivated legislations unless we first begin bycheck the roots of this subject. The first and single most importantquestion to answer in this respect is, what had propelled themovement of Chinese people into the state of California?
Oneof the main factors that made Chinese people to migrate into U.S andmore specifically into the state of California was the discovery ofgold in mid 19thcentury. This did not only attract people from China but also individualsfrom different parts of the world. In addition that America providedand the chance to become rich in a state by simply working in a minewas attractive bait to many Chinese (David7 Alice 57). Also United States had enjoyed a relative period of politicalstability while wars and amine were very common in China especiallyin 1840s and 50s. Finally, the Taiping rebellion coerced many Chineseto look for a new and better homes and no other place offered betterprospects than California. The unearthing of gold in California wasfollowed by a mass movement of Chinese people into California (David7 Alice 58). . In the early years after discovery of gold in 1848 there were veryquarrels since gold was plentiful, but as gold became more sparserthe Chinese community that had grown significantly in number startedto become a target of animosity from the whites miners (Cahee8).
Diagramshowing Chinese Population by State
Source:U.S.Census for1850, 1860, 1870,1880, 1890and 1900
Inthe 1850s there were many Chinese people who providing labor inmining companies in the state of California. Mining companies hiredmany people and this led to the influx of Chinese people into thestate of California (Bodenner2).For example, in 1850 there were only 519 Chinese in California butone decade later the number had grown into 1860.
TheCase of the Exclusion Act
Thevery first incidence that marked the beginning of Anti-Chinesesentiments as the introduction of miners taxes. These foreign taxeswere very discriminatory since they were only meant to preventparticipation of Chinese people in mining activities, and a s resultwas removed in 1851 one year after their passage (Daniels,Roger, & Otis 97). The anti-Chinese ordinances ere considered unconstitutional at thistime. Nonetheless, the growing white displeasure about the influx ofChinese people into California and the rising anti-Chinese feelingprovided opportunity for opportunistic politicians such as BiglerJohn. Bigler contested the California seat on the platform ofanti-Chinese and he was elected governor. Due to the risinganti-chinese feelings backed by the political class spearheded by theWorkingman’s party, the racists crusade helped make grounds forpassage of legislation in the California constitution in 1879(Bodenner2). The constitution of 1879 had very powerful and deeply discriminatoryterms about the Chinese. In the second section the constitutionstated that: “No corporation now existing or hereafter formed under the laws ofthis State, shall, after the adoption of this Constitution, employdirectly or indirectly, in any capacity, any Chinese or Mongolian .”(Cahee9)
Diagramshowing the Population of Chinese in the State of California andUnited States from 1850 to 1910
Source:U.S.Census for1850, 1860, 1870,1880,1890and 1900
Ascan be observed this section clearly the constitution forbidscompanies from employing people of Chinese origin for form or kind ofwork. This does a lot of harm for Chinese people becauseopportunities in firms are based on race. Section three as even morespecific in isolating Chinese from the public sector. It stated that:‘’NoChinese shall be employed on any State, county, municipal, or otherpublic work, except in punishment for crime.” (Cahee10)
Thesetwo sections just shows the extent to which the state of Californiawas willing to go to prevent Chinese from immigrating to the stateand from working in private and public sector. Evidently this limitedopportunities for particular groups of individuals.
UndoubtedlyThe Exclusion act completely changed the cycles of immigration in thestate of California that had been seen in the past 30 years beforethe passage of the constitutions in 1879 (Daniels,Roger, & Otis 97). This not only affected the migration of pattern of Chinese communityinto the state of California but also significantly changed thecomposition of the population in California (Bodenner5).After the implementation of the exclusion act, there existed no legalways through which Chinese people would enter the state of Californiaand as such many immigrants who moved into the country after thepassage of these legislations had to sneak in through either Canadain the North or Mexico in the South. The passage of the 979constitution made the state of California a less attractive home forthe Chinese population (Cahee2).
From the said issues, above, one can see that,theConstitution found in the State of California refers to the reportthat creates and shows the duties, powers, structure and capacity ofthe administration of the U.S. condition of California. California`sconstitution is one of the longest accumulations of laws on theplanet, since it is has 110 pages with it. The constitution hasexperienced various changes following its funny drafting. Aconsiderable lot of the signatories to the state`s unique 1849constitution were themselves unmistakable in their own privilege, andare consequently recorded underneath. The U.S is a state that iscreated on the idea of immigration and chances, and in its historythere is no other place where the statement mentioned above becomesvery very true. Itis good saying that, Chinese exclusion act as not the mostdiscriminatory policies in the United States, in reality it as thepolicy that refused all Chinese from participating in any form ofwork in California that hurt the Chinese community the most.  TheCalifornia constitution is one the most well known example andincidence of local legislation that touched on issues that related toemployment of people based on their ethnicity and race outside of thesouth, and policies relating the black codes. Nonetheless, it ishealthy to be aware of that we can not fully understand these biasedand racially motivated legislations unless we first begin by checkthe roots of this subject. The very first incidence that marked thebeginning of Anti-Chinese sentiments as the introduction of minerstaxes.
Bodenner,Chris. “Chinese Exclusion Act.”Issues& Controversies in American History.InfobasePublishing, 20 Oct. 2006. Web. 2 Jan.2015.<http://icah.infobaselearning.com/icahfullarticle.aspx?ID=107565>
Bryce,Viscount. `KearneyismIn California`. Sfmuseum.net.N.p., 2013. Web. 21 Jan. 2015.
Cahee,M. TheCalifornia Constitution of 1879 and Chinese Migration.WordPress.2008. Retrieved from:https://mcahee.wordpress.com/2008/12/30/chinese-migration-to-california-and-the-constitution-of-1879/
Daniels,Roger, and Otis L. Graham.DebatingAmerican Immigration, 1882-Present.Lanham, Md: Rowman& Littlefield Publishers, 2001. Print.
Desty,Robert. `The Constitution Of The State Of California Adopted In 1879:California. InternetArchive.N.p.,1895. Web. 21 Jan. 2015.
Eng,David L, and Alice Y. Hom.Q &a:Queer in Asian America.Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1998.
Grodin,Joseph R, And Calvin, Massey.TheCalifornia State Constitution.Abc-Clio,1993. Print.
Korey,John L. CaliforniaGovernment.Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath, 1995. Print.
Law.georgetown.edu,.`CaliforniaResearch In-Depth â€” Georgetown Law`.N.p., 2015. Web. 21 Jan.2015.
Moorhead,Dudley T. `Sectionalism And The California Constitution Of 1879`.PacificHistorical Review12.3 (1943): 287-293. Web. 21 Jan. 2015.
Noel,Sargent. `The California Constitutional Convention Of 1878-1879(Concluded). InternetArchive.N.p.,1918. Web. 21 Jan. 2015.
Sandmeyer,Elmer C. The Anti-Chinese Movement inCalifornia. Urbana: University ofIllinois Press, 1991. Print.