CriticalAnalysis Assessment Description
CriticalAnalysis Assessment Description
Anarticle entitled "DebilitatingEffects of TV on Children"authored by Dr. John Grohol (2009) elucidates it is not healthy forchildren to watch too much television (Grohol, 2009). In addition, heasserts that children who watch too much television get theirscholarly performance affected. Additionally, the author argues thattoo much television for children can cause health issues or influencethem to lose their innocence. The principle reason for this articleis to persuade the audience concerning the negative outcomes ofwatching too much television our more youthful generation. The authorargues his points on the negativity of too much television onchildren in terms of amount and quality of the content.
Inaddition, the article indicates that parents neglect on screeningwhat they permit their children to watch on television. It likewisedemonstrates how their developing personalities are retaining whatthey see and hear on television and the contrary results to it. Dr.Grohol`s principal contention is that there are numerous destructiveimpacts from youngsters and youths who watch excessive television.Dr. Grohol clarifies that parents only want to protect their kidsfrom harmful conduct, but not when they watch much television. Dr.Grohol contends that the research studies from the past, present andthe future, demonstrates how the youthful era is suffering in avariety of distinctive ways, scholastically and socially (Grohol,2009).
Dr.Grohol utilizes numerous realities to help his contention, from 2007at Columbia`s College of Surgeons and Physicians. They presumed thatyouths who viewed more than one to two hours of television every daywere at possibility for attaining low grades and academicdisappointment for the individuals who watched television for morethan three hours a day. He additionally referred to TheAmerican Archives of Adolescent and Pediatric Medicinein 2005, which concluded that watching an excessive amount of TVcauses a lower instructive level into adulthood (Grohol, 2009).
Helikewise talked about the University of Michigan Health Systems,which expresses that youngsters who watch an excessive amount oftelevision do not just constrain their training, but additionallyrisk having wellbeing issues later in life. The author concludes hiscontention by expressing that studies have indicated teenagers whowatch sexual content on television will likely end up being a teenageparent, for instance, a young mother, or get involved in sexualactivities more compared to their peers.
Theprinciple conclusion in this article is that television does notbring about a significant improvement in a person`s life. The articleencourages teenagers to switch off their televisions and spend theirtime in other activities. The major assumptions that underlay theauthor`s reasoning is that watching too much television leads tohealth issues, academic failure, lower grades, and teenagepregnancies, and negative attitudes towards school (Grohol, 2009).
Iconcur with Dr. Grohol about getting to be sedentary from viewing anexcess of television, which can result in numerous health concerns.Additionally, I do agree that people should switch off theirtelevision sets and go outside as they have previously done. Thefacts or evidence the writer utilizes as a part of this article tosupport the contentions are as per the following:
A 2005 study that was distributed in the Adolescent Medicine and American achieves of pediatrician. It found that the increment of television being viewed ultimately prompted teenage pregnancies, a decrease in health, in addition, childhood were no longer interested in seeking further education. The affected parties were no longer interested in the essential college education.
A 2007 study that was carried out in Columbia resulted similarly to the 2005 study. The modern, youthful era was inadequate in scholarly research, performance and was deficient in the home work office.
Thekey conclusion in this article is that everything in excess ispoisonous. In life, everything is good as long as there ismoderation. Likewise, television is not the issue in this scenario.However, the author`s concern is the quality and quantity beingutilized while watching television.
Theprinciple suppositions underlying the author`s reasoning are thatAmerican guardian is either one of the following things. Possibly,guardians are aware of the detrimental dangers of the watching toomuch television yet neglect to guide their children, or, they are noteducated on the matter (Grohol, 2009).
Ona research conducted outside, Dr.Grohol`s Theodosiadou and Markos(2013) argue that preschool educators consider television to be anawful impact on preschool kids, additionally attest that youngstersgain from TV. They especially stretch the negative impacts oftelevision on kids` advancement and conduct, for example, broadcastsavagery and the treatment of the child viewer as a`shopper`(Theodosiadou & Markos, 2013).
Iagree with the arguments raised by John Grohol. The author`s articlepoints out that most experts specialized in child developmentrecommend that children should not watch television prior to age twoor three. A research carried out at the Universityof Washingtonestablished that teenagers who watch much television before age threescored low grades on mathematics and reading tests at the ages of sixand seven. Therefore, I concur that Grohol (2009) makes validarguments considering that the adverse impacts of television startmuch sooner than a kid begins formal educating (Grohol, 2009).
Grohol,J. (2009). The Debilitating Effects of TV on Children. PsychCentral.Retrieved fromhttp://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/
Theodosiadou,S., & Markos, A. (2013). Attitudes of preschool 1 teachers inNorthern Greece on children and TV viewing. AustralasianJournal of Early Childhood,38 (3) pp. 43