A Miscommunication in My Life

AMiscommunication in My Life


AMiscommunication in My Life

Ihave been in a relationship with my girlfriend for two years. I haveknown I wanted to be engaged to her since our relationship has grownto be intense over time. We have explored the highs and lows ofdating. We have struggled with issues and battled together manytimes. Moreover, we have had extraordinary triumphs and highs. Attimes, we cried together and regularly laughed, wrangled more, andsmiled the most. My girlfriend and I have willingly supported eachother in the battles and struggles of education trying to build ourcareers.

Wehave spent times when we were both financially stable. Other times wewere both broke, but we used to make a joke about the situation. Wehave been faithfully dedicated to each other and considered eachother accountable to purity. We have wrestled conviction andapologized transparently to each other.

Wehave experienced passionate feelings for each other`s families wehave spent days longing for our future family. We have gone to thegym together, done shopping together, and given charity together withthe aim of helping the poor. At our free time, we found ourselvesstudying together, and at times, going for a walk with each other.Whenever I irritated her, she knows how to communicate the problems.I would then apologize and console her. Things were running smoothly.Every day, we had decided to grow in love together.

Ilove her very much, and she means a lot to me. I will do anything tosee our relationship succeed. For the first time, I feel good that Iam committed to someone who is loving and faithful. In addition, mygirlfriend has many strong points that make her beautiful in physicalfeatures and character. This relationship fills my heart with joy andhappiness. I love everything about my relationship.

Nonetheless,I found that we had a miscommunication issue when she began beingcommanding and authoritative in the recent past. This brought badmemories that I experienced in my childhood and others that Iencountered when I was in secondary school. There is one student whowas selected for a leadership position in the class, and he trulymisused his powers. Initially, he was a humble person, however, afterthe class prefect appointment, his character changed and the pride inhim made me hate bossy people. That is the point at which I developeda miscommunication problem of listening to authoritative figures.From police, teachers to parents, or any other person who would speakfrom an authoritative tone, I would just ignore them.

Thisproblem became acute after witnessing two police officers harassingan innocent person while doing a random search on the streets. Thepolice handled the person as a suspect and after realizing he wasinnocent, they just left without any apologies. I was angered by thisconduct and developed a negative attitude to people who feel morepowerful and significant than others do (Segal et al., 2008).

Atwhatever point I was late for a date, she would not like to hear myclarification. Our correspondence disintegrated since she felt thather contentions were consistently right. At any point that sherequested something, I needed to fulfill it immediately or else shewould go silent on me. My relationship became a job of keeping herhappy. It was constantly about her and no any consideration about me.I never knew how to communicate this challenge with her.

Ilikewise came to discover that my unconsciously held mentalitytowards persons with authority was additionally uncovered in mypersonal perspectives on the association with people in school andother organizations. I have needed to try to overcome the biasagainst bureaucratic corporate society. Consequently, I felt the needof making my body and being my boss. I felt the comfortable when nothaving to answer to anyone (Spitzberg &amp Cupach, 2013).

Ibegan to consider approaches to change her. I found effectivetechniques for improving her conduct. I chose to use positivereinforcement, which is a useful method to initiating change. Ithought of using a close friend`s help to tell her where she wasgoing wrong. However, since I never knew how she would react, I choseto hold back. When we were quiet, and my accomplice was more open toa dialog, I would try to bring up the issue but I found myselflistening to her stories. I never found a good opportunity to bringup the issue.

WheneverI got the opportunity, I would tell her how much I missed thosenights when we used to spend good times together without her usingcommanding language. Her argument was that she was preparing me tobecome a good husband. I then understood that she still loved me.Through utilizing love as opposed to outrage, I created a betterpossibility of correcting the situation (Segal et al., 2008).

Ifound communicating with other individuals about my problemsproductive when I tried to improve the challenges in my life.Nonetheless, the lion`s share of circumstances individuals examinewith me in guiding sessions are about correspondence gone amiss it ispossible that they don`t comprehend what others are attempting topass on, or they are not ready to convey in a manner that is seen byothers. Surely, this is a typical hierarchical concern as any twopeople are sure to see the world in an unexpected way. Thosedistinctions are both the seeds of clash and the wellspring of newthoughts and arrangements

Communicationsetbacks can result in unimaginable torment as I know from individualexperience. Miscommunication has caused me restless nights,uneasiness, and a lot of anxieties. To help people maintain astrategic distance from a comparative destiny, here are thestrategies I have been utilizing to intention miscommunications(Spitzberg &amp Cupach, 2013).

Theconcepts I learned in my class helped me a lot. I understood that oneof the first steps to help work through a miscommunication is to findout the primary reason for the problem with relating to the otherindividual. This comprehension is expected to help direct my choicesabout determining the issue and to give a critical quality check:&quotHave I protected or upgraded the status of this relationshipthrough finding out a miscommunication?&quot If I can answer thatquestion emphatically, I know that I am overall correct.

Ido not attempt to assess my success focused around whether mygirlfriend now sees &quothow right I am.&quot This systemunavoidably prompts further communication calamities. I have observedthat clarity on three levels is obliged to resolution amisconception:

  • The primary level is acquiring an understanding of the truths of the miscommunication

  • The second level is talking about the setbacks brought by those certainties,

  • The third level is picking up assention about what to do next (Segal et al., 2008).

Toaddition a typical understanding of the target certainties of thecircumstances, it is imperative to talk through regulated yourinsight into the conditions and check it with the other individual.You might not have some crucial pieces, or they may not. Together,you are more prone to have the entire picture. Every now and againindividuals are working from an alternate set of realities about whathas transpired, which starts a cycle of misconception.

Inplanning for the discussion, a person should make sure that he/sheremoves his/ her understandings and feelings from the occasionsthemselves. Attempt to be short, precise, and particular about thereal circumstances that happened, in the request they happened. Thinkabout making as a rundown of the certainties before the gathering andaltering out unnecessary subtle elements and passionate remarks. Asof right now you are essentially attempting to make sense of whathappened, not how you felt about it. On the off chance thatconceivable, attempt to attain concurrence with the other individualon the essential actualities of what transpired before you move tothe following level (Segal et al., 2008).

Thefollowing level presupposes were getting clarity about whatimportance every characteristic attributed to the occasions thathappened. What is illuminated is your particular reaction to whathappened. This is fruitful domain for errors, as people regularlymake distinctive determinations from the same occasions. The key isunderstanding that your translation is by all account not the onlyone, nor solely the right one. Diverse foundations, societies,businesses, orders, levels of experience and identities impactindividuals to ascribe unfathomably distinctive intending to the sameoccasion.

Aperson can take in an incredible arrangement on the off chance thatyou listen to how others encountered and deciphered thecircumstances. As they tune in, consider how both of theirunderstanding can be correct. On can ask him/herself &quotHow couldthat be genuine?&quot when an elucidation one discovers hard toacknowledge is clarified. Opening one to other conceivable truthswill prompt fantastic new conclusions and achievements (Spitzberg &ampCupach, 2013).

Aperson is not going to acquire much concurrence with others at thislevel. At the levels of realities and activities, it is vital toconcur at the degree of elucidation, it is more critical to heareach other`s point of view and see what you can realize. Be liberalin permitting others to have their perspective. A person would prefernot to contend, shield, or induce – their employment is essentiallyto get it. Amid the discussion, one may make inquiries to guaranteethat he/she is sure about their point of view. In the event that youtruly do not comprehend their elucidation, request more information.

Inthis third level, a person is looking for clarity around what movesneed to be made focused on your understanding of the actualities andthe elucidations. Numerous diverse methodologies can be considered.For example, would reach somebody, setting up another framework,examining a report, or executing a system help repair thecircumstances? Think of some as alternatives all alone before meetingexpectations through them with others, yet do not get to be so joinedthere is no option the ones you created ahead of time. You may findthat amid the discussion, and you can make far superior arrangements(Tannen, 2014).

Considerbeginning the discussion with an inquiry to comprehend others`thoughts regarding how to move ahead. What proposals does a personneeds to cure this circumstance? What needs to happen next?Frequently there are distinctive layers of activities at which themisconception needs to be tended to. For example, one may have oneset of activities that includes staff, an alternate that connectswith the customer and an alternative that obliges another system(Segal et al., 2008). On the other hand, somebody may recommend thata master plan adjustment is required while you have beencontemplating a more itemized piece. Concur on the grouping and thespecifics of the activities recognized, so both gatherings comprehendwhat are in store going ahead. Without clarity on this level,miscommunications keep on festering with new misconceptions stackedon top of old ones (Tannen, 2014).

Afteryou have picked up clarity on every one of the three levels, you canbe surer about your understanding of what happened, how othersdeciphered the circumstances and what to do about it. I would say,the arrangements that emerge from these multi-layered discussions arefrequently a great deal more canny and imaginative than anticipated.Determining errors turns into a wellspring of advancement, deeperunderstanding, and enhanced work connections.


Segal,P., Dorfman, D., McAlpine, D. M., Castellucci, T., Nicholson, J.,Sandler, A., &amp Tomei, M. (2008). Angermanagement.Škofljica: Blitz Film &amp Video Distribution.

Spitzberg,B. H., &amp Cupach, W. R. (2013). TheDark Side of Close Relationships.Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

Tannen,D. (2014). That`snot what i meant!: How conversational style makes or breaksrelationships.S.l.: Harper Perennial.